The Common Structure of Religion, Philosophy and Politics in Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus
نویسندگان
چکیده
Spinoza’s Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (TTP) is one of the first and most important theoretical justifications of the separation of religion from philosophy and from politics. The separation of church and state and the separation of theology from other scientific disciplines are of course defining moments of contemporary secularity. While it can easily appear from certain religiously conservative or atheistic viewpoints that religion and secularity are simply antagonistic forces in modern life, understanding the ways in which this independent secularity is originally explained and justified on a theological basis can offer a more historically comprehensive grasp of this opposition. For this reason it is worthwhile to revisit Spinoza’s TTP with a view to understanding this foundational and highly contentious justification for the limitation of religion’s influence in politics and philosophy. In this paper I hope to show that fully understanding Spinoza’s arguments in the TTP concerning religion, philosophy and politics requires a recognition of the common logical structure these arguments share with his metaphysical theology. Thus even Spinoza’s revolutionary argument for a radically independent secularity is grounded in and inseparable from a certain conception of the relation between God and nature.
منابع مشابه
Intentionality, Politics, And Religion
The idea that intentionality is the distinctive mark of the mental or that only mental phenomena have intentionality emerged in the philosophical tradition after Franz Brentano. Much of contemporary philosophy is dedicated to a rejection of the view that mental phenomena have original intentionality. In other words, main strands of contemporary philosophy seek to naturalize intentionality of th...
متن کاملThe Effective Role Of Religion Scholars in Samanid Government Structure
Communities in which religion plays a pivotal role, the relationship between the government and religion scholars affect politics deeply. During the Samanid government, religion scholars had a special status in the political structure as well as in the society. Their presence could be seen not only in religious positions, but also in state and political positions. Governmental policy of the Sam...
متن کاملKant’s Philosophy of Religion and the Challenges of Moral Commitment
Kant believes that the concepts of a just and compassionate God and the life beyond death spring from our rational need to unite happiness with virtue. But since Kant had banished happiness from any place in moral reasoning, his philosophy of religion have been deemed as not merely discontinuous with his ethics but radically opposed to it. This article tries to argue against this apparent incon...
متن کاملThe Different Layers of Islam in Interaction with Politics: a Comparative Analysis of Iran, Saudi Arabia and Turkey
This study attempts to assess the different ways through which Islam as a religion can impact politics. In fact, the notion that is collectively labeled as Islam and its re-interpretation as an escalating presence of religion in politics in today's world has deep layers. To distinguish a variety of these layers, each with different characteristics, they should be defined, and the type of contri...
متن کاملWeapons of Mass Destruction in Context; Investigating the Links between Militarization and Godlessness of Modern Politics
Modern brutality, which found its culmination in using weapons of mass destruction (WMD) against humanity, is the dark side of the principal teachings of the Enlightenment. The great thinkers of the Enlightenment, blaming religion as the main source of violence, removed God from the center of Western political and social thought to replace it with human. Although they were not conscious of the ...
متن کامل